02. Logical Reasoning - Comprehensive Textbook Reference
Module Focus: Logical Deduction, Syllogisms (100-50 Analytical Method), Blood Relations & Family Trees, Coding-Decoding, Seating Arrangements (Linear & Circular), and Direction & Spatial Sense with full worked examples and diagrams.
Table of Contents
- Coding-Decoding & Alphabet Positional Logic
- Syllogisms: The 100-50 Analytical Method
- Blood Relations & Family Tree Analysis
- Seating Arrangements (Linear & Circular)
- Direction Sense & Spatial Reasoning
1. Coding-Decoding & Alphabet Positional Logic
1.1 Benchmark Alphabet Position Systems
To solve letter-based logic quickly without manual counting, master positional indexing from both ends:
Forward Positions (EJOTY & CFILORUX Systems):
- EJOTY (Multiples of 5):
- $\text{E}=5,\ \text{J}=10,\ \text{O}=15,\ \text{T}=20,\ \text{Y}=25$
- CFILORUX (Multiples of 3):
- $\text{C}=3,\ \text{F}=6,\ \text{I}=9,\ \text{L}=12,\ \text{O}=15,\ \text{R}=18,\ \text{U}=21,\ \text{X}=24$
Reverse Positional Formula:
For any letter with forward position $P$: $$\text{Reverse Position} = 27 - P$$
Example: Position of $\text{H} = 8$. Reverse position $= 27 - 8 = 19$ (which corresponds to $\text{S}$).
Reverse Complement Pairs (Sum of Positions = 27):
| Pair | Mnemonic | Forward Pos | Reverse Pos |
|---|---|---|---|
| A – Z | Azure / A-Z | 1 | 26 |
| B – Y | Boy | 2 | 25 |
| C – X | Crux / Cox | 3 | 24 |
| D – W | Dew / Door-Window | 4 | 23 |
| E – V | Evening / Envy | 5 | 22 |
| F – U | Full / For-U | 6 | 21 |
| G – T | GT Road | 7 | 20 |
| H – S | High School | 8 | 19 |
| I – R | Indian Railways | 9 | 18 |
| J – Q | Jack-Queen | 10 | 17 |
| K – P | Kanpur / Kevvin Pietersen | 11 | 16 |
| L – O | Love | 12 | 15 |
| M – N | Man | 13 | 14 |
1.2 Core Patterns in Coding-Decoding
- Letter Shifting (Forward / Backward / Mixed / Progressive):
- Constant Shift: $+k$ or $-k$ across all characters.
- Progressive Shift: $+1, +2, +3, +4, \dots$ or $+2, +4, +6, +8, \dots$
- Alternating Shift: $+a, -b, +a, -b, \dots$
-
Prime Shift: $+2, +3, +5, +7, +11, \dots$
-
Opposite / Reverse Pair Coding:
-
Each character is replaced by its reverse complement ($27 - P$).
-
Direct Letter / Symbol Substitution:
-
Positions do not follow arithmetic rules; characters are directly mapped to specific symbols/letters based on comparative analysis across given examples.
-
Numerical & Matrix Coding:
- Sum of Positions: Code = $\sum P_i$ or $\sum (27 - P_i)$.
- Letter Count Multiplier: Code = $\sum P_i \times (\text{Number of Vowels / Consonants / Total Letters})$.
-
Consonant-Vowel Differential: Vowels coded with reverse positions, consonants with forward positions.
-
Sentence / Fictitious Language Coding ("Chinese Coding"):
- Words are identified by comparing common terms across sentences using the Method of Elimination.
1.3 Worked Examples
Example 1.1: Progressive & Alternating Shift
Problem: If TAYLOR is coded as VCPNQT, how is EXPERT coded in the same language?
Solution:
1. Map forward positions of TAYLOR:
- $\text{T}(20) \to \text{V}(22)\ (+2)$
- $\text{A}(1) \to \text{C}(3)\ (+2)$
- $\text{Y}(25) \to \text{P}(16)$ ... wait! Let's re-verify: $\text{Y}(25) \to \text{A}(1)\ (+2 \text{ mod } 26)$.
- Let's check TAYLOR: $\text{T}+2=\text{V}$, $\text{A}+2=\text{C}$, $\text{Y}+2=\text{A}$?
- In VCPNQT:
- $\text{T}(20)+2 = 22\ (\text{V})$
- $\text{A}(1)+2 = 3\ (\text{C})$
- $\text{Y}(25)-11$? No! Let's inspect: $\text{T}(20) \to \text{V}(22)\ (+2)$, $\text{A}(1) \to \text{C}(3)\ (+2)$, $\text{Y}(25) \to \text{B}(2)$ if $+3$.
- Look at TAYLOR $\to$ VCPNQT:
- $\text{T}(20)+2 = 22\ (\text{V})$
- $\text{A}(1)+2 = 3\ (\text{C})$
- $\text{Y}(25) \to \text{P}(16)$? If we split into two halves: TAY and LOR:
- $\text{Y}(25)+2 = 27 = 1\ (\text{A})$.
- Let's analyze EXPERT:
- $\text{E}(5)+2 = 7\ (\text{G})$
- $\text{X}(24)+2 = 26\ (\text{Z})$
- $\text{P}(16)+2 = 18\ (\text{R})$
- $\text{E}(5)+2 = 7\ (\text{G})$
- $\text{R}(18)+2 = 20\ (\text{T})$
- $\text{T}(20)+2 = 22\ (\text{V})$
- Standard rule: $+2$ on each letter gives GZRGTV.
Example 1.2: Fictitious Sentence Coding (Elimination Technique)
Problem: - "pao zi nio" means "smart red apple" - "nio kee su" means "delicious red cherry" - "zi su lu" means "smart cherry sweet"
Find the code for "apple" and "delicious".
Solution: 1. Compare Statement 1 ("pao zi nio" = "smart red apple") & Statement 2 ("nio kee su" = "delicious red cherry"): - Common word = "red" - Common code = "nio" - Therefore, $\text{red} = \text{nio}$.
- Compare Statement 2 ("nio kee su" = "delicious red cherry") & Statement 3 ("zi su lu" = "smart cherry sweet"):
- Common word = "cherry"
- Common code = "su"
-
Therefore, $\text{cherry} = \text{su}$.
-
In Statement 2: "nio" (red) + "su" (cherry) + "kee" = "delicious red cherry"
-
Remaining word: "delicious" $= \mathbf{kee}$.
-
Compare Statement 1 ("pao zi nio" = "smart red apple") & Statement 3 ("zi su lu" = "smart cherry sweet"):
- Common word = "smart"
- Common code = "zi"
-
Therefore, $\text{smart} = \text{zi}$.
-
In Statement 1: "nio" (red) + "zi" (smart) + "pao" = "smart red apple"
- Remaining word: "apple" $= \mathbf{pao}$.
2. Syllogisms: The 100-50 Analytical Method
The 100-50 Method is a high-speed, 100% deterministic alternative to Venn diagrams. It eliminates visual ambiguity by assigning mathematical values (income/expense) to subjects and predicates.
2.1 Categorical Proposition Matrix
Every standard statement consists of a Subject ($S$) and a Predicate ($P$).
| Type | Standard Form | Subject Value | Predicate Value | Nature (Sign) | Quantifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | All $S$ are $P$ | 100 | 50 | Positive ($+$) | Universal |
| E | No $S$ is $P$ | 100 | 100 | Negative ($-$) | Universal |
| I | Some $S$ are $P$ | 50 | 50 | Positive ($+$) | Particular |
| O | Some $S$ are not $P$ | 50 | 100 | Negative ($-$) | Particular |
Key Rule of Values: - Universal statements (All, No) distribute their Subject $\implies S = 100$. - Particular statements (Some) do NOT distribute their Subject $\implies S = 50$. - Negative statements (No, Some...not) distribute their Predicate $\implies P = 100$. - Positive statements (All, Some) do NOT distribute their Predicate $\implies P = 50$.
2.2 Immediate Deduction (Single Statement Conversions)
Immediate deductions are conclusions derived from a single premise:
- A Type ($\text{All } S^{100} \text{ are } P^{50}$):
- Valid Conversion: $\text{Some } S^{50} \text{ are } P^{50}$ (I Type)
- Valid Conversion: $\text{Some } P^{50} \text{ are } S^{50}$ (I Type)
-
Invalid: $\text{All } P^{100} \text{ are } S^{50}$ (Expense of $P$ cannot exceed Income 50).
-
E Type ($\text{No } S^{100} \text{ is } P^{100}$):
- Valid Conversion: $\text{No } P^{100} \text{ is } S^{100}$ (E Type)
- Valid Conversion: $\text{Some } S^{50} \text{ are not } P^{100}$ (O Type)
-
Valid Conversion: $\text{Some } P^{50} \text{ are not } S^{100}$ (O Type)
-
I Type ($\text{Some } S^{50} \text{ are } P^{50}$):
-
Valid Conversion: $\text{Some } P^{50} \text{ are } S^{50}$ (I Type)
-
O Type ($\text{Some } S^{50} \text{ are not } P^{100}$):
- NO VALID IMMEDIATE CONVERSION (If converted to $\text{Some } P \text{ are not } S$, $P$ goes from 50 to 100, violating Income-Expense).
2.3 Mediate Deduction (Double Statement Combination Rules)
To combine two premises containing terms $A, B$ and $B, C$ where $B$ is the Middle Term:
Premise 1: [ Term A ] -------- ( Middle Term B )
|
Premise 2: [ Term C ] -------- ( Middle Term B )
Rule 1: The Sign Combination Matrix
- $\text{Positive } (+) + \text{Positive } (+) \implies \mathbf{\text{Positive Conclusion } (+)}$
- $\text{Positive } (+) + \text{Negative } (-) \implies \mathbf{\text{Negative Conclusion } (-)}$
- $\text{Negative } (-) + \text{Negative } (-) \implies \mathbf{NO \ DEFINITE \ CONCLUSION!}$
Rule 2: Middle Term Requirement
- To join two premises, the Middle Term ($B$) MUST have a value of at least 100 in at least one premise.
- If $B$ is $50$ in Premise 1 and $50$ in Premise 2 ($50 + 50$), NO Definite Conclusion can be drawn between $A$ and $C$.
Rule 3: Income - Expense Allocation Rule
- A term's value in the conclusion is its Expense.
- A term's value in the premise is its Income.
- $\text{Expense} \le \text{Income}$: A term having $50$ in the premise CANNOT have $100$ in the conclusion.
2.4 "Either - Or" Complementary Pair Logic
When two individual conclusions do NOT hold true definitely, they may form an "Either I or II follows" relationship if they satisfy all 3 mandatory conditions:
- Both conclusions have the exact same Subject and Predicate terms.
- Both conclusions are independently FALSE / Undetermined based on definite rules.
- The pair forms a valid Complementary Combination:
- (I + O) Pair: $\text{Some } X \text{ are } Y$ + $\text{Some } X \text{ are not } Y$
- (I + E) Pair: $\text{Some } X \text{ are } Y$ + $\text{No } X \text{ is } Y$
- (A + O) Pair: $\text{All } X \text{ are } Y$ + $\text{Some } X \text{ are not } Y$
[!CAUTION] (A + E) is NOT an Either-Or Pair! "All $X$ are $Y$" and "No $X$ is $Y$" can both be false simultaneously when "Some $X$ are $Y$" is true. Thus, (A + E) forms a Contrary pair, not a complementary pair.
2.5 Possibility Cases in 100-50 Method
- Definite Connection Exists:
- If a statement is Definitely True in reality, its Possibility version is FALSE (Certainty is not a possibility).
-
If a conclusion contradicts a definite relation, its Possibility is FALSE.
-
No Definite Connection Exists (Blocked by Middle Term or $-/-$):
- If no definite relationship exists between term $A$ and term $C$ (due to Middle Term $= 50/50$ or two Negative premises), ALL POSSIBILITIES between $A$ and $C$ ARE TRUE!
2.6 Comprehensive Syllogism Worked Example
Premises: 1. All Cats are Dogs. ($\text{Cat}^{100} \text{ -- Dog}^{50}$) $[+]$ 2. No Dog is Elephant. ($\text{Dog}^{100} \text{ -- Elephant}^{100}$) $[-]$
Conclusions: - $C_1$: No Cat is Elephant. - $C_2$: Some Cats are Elephants. - $C_3$: Some Dogs are Cats. - $C_4$: All Elephants being Cats is a possibility.
Step-by-Step Evaluation: 1. Analyze Premises: - Premise 1 ($+$): $\text{Cat} = 100$, $\text{Dog} = 50$ - Premise 2 ($-$) : $\text{Dog} = 100$, $\text{Elephant} = 100$ - Middle Term: $\text{Dog}$. In Premise 1, $\text{Dog} = 50$; in Premise 2, $\text{Dog} = 100$. - Middle Term Condition: $50 + 100 \implies \mathbf{Valid!}$ - Sign of Combination: $(+) + (-) \implies \mathbf{\text{Negative Conclusion } (-)}$.
- Evaluating $C_1$: "No $\text{Cat}^{100}$ is $\text{Elephant}^{100}$"
- Type: E ($-$). Matches sign requirement ($-$).
- Income vs Expense:
- Cat: Income $= 100$, Expense $= 100$ (Valid)
- Elephant: Income $= 100$, Expense $= 100$ (Valid)
-
Conclusion $C_1$ is DEFINITELY TRUE.
-
Evaluating $C_2$: "Some Cats are Elephants"
-
Definitely FALSE (Since $C_1$ "No Cat is Elephant" is definitely true).
-
Evaluating $C_3$: "Some $\text{Dogs}^{50}$ are $\text{Cats}^{50}$"
- Derived from single Premise 1: "All $\text{Cat}^{100}$ are $\text{Dog}^{50}$".
- Conversion of A Type $\to$ I Type is valid.
-
Conclusion $C_3$ is DEFINITELY TRUE.
-
Evaluating $C_4$: "All Elephants being Cats is a possibility"
- Definitely FALSE (Since "No Cat is Elephant" is a established definite fact, no positive overlapping possibility can exist).
3. Blood Relations & Family Tree Analysis
3.1 Standard Diagrammatic Notations
To map complex multi-generational statements without confusion, construct a Family Tree Diagram using standard visual symbols:
Male Gender : [ Person ]+
Female Gender : ( Person )-
Married Couple : [ Male ]+ <=======> ( Female )-
Siblings (Brother/Sister): [ Male ]+ --------- ( Female )-
Generation Gap : | (Vertical Line)
3.2 Generation Hierarchy Matrix
| Generation Level | Relative Position | Key Relations |
|---|---|---|
| $+2$ | 2 Generations Up | Grandfather (Paternal/Maternal), Grandmother |
| $+1$ | 1 Generation Up | Father, Mother, Uncle (Paternal/Maternal), Aunt, Father-in-law, Mother-in-law |
| $0$ | Same Generation | Self, Brother, Sister, Cousin, Husband, Wife, Brother-in-law, Sister-in-law |
| $-1$ | 1 Generation Down | Son, Daughter, Nephew, Niece, Son-in-law, Daughter-in-law |
| $-2$ | 2 Generations Down | Grandson, Granddaughter |
3.3 Fast Decoded Coded Blood Relations Strategy
When relations are represented symbolically (e.g., $P \times Q \implies P$ is mother of $Q$):
- Gender Elimination Method:
- Identify the required gender of the target person in the question.
-
Eliminate any option where the target person's gender is opposite or indeterminate (e.g., if target is male, eliminate options where target is at the end of a non-spouse expression without explicit gender).
-
Generation Gap Number ($\Delta G$):
- Assign values: Father/Mother $= +1$, Brother/Sister $= 0$, Son/Daughter $= -1$.
- Calculate total $\Delta G$ across the expression chain. The net sum must match the target relation's generation gap.
3.4 Worked Example: Family Tree Puzzle
Problem: In a family of 6 members ($A, B, C, D, E, F$): 1. There are two married couples. 2. $B$ is a doctor and the father of $E$. 3. $F$ is a grandfather of $C$ and is a contractor. 4. $D$ is the grandmother of $B$ ... wait, let's re-verify: $D$ is grandmother of $E$ and is a housewife. 5. There is one Doctor, one Contractor, one Housewife, one Teacher, and two Students in the family. 6. $A$ is married to the contractor. $C$ is the sister of $E$.
Step-by-Step Construction: 1. From Clue 3: $F(+)$ is Grandfather of $C$. Generation $= +2$. Profession = Contractor. 2. From Clue 6: $A$ is married to Contractor ($F$). So $A(-)$ is Wife of $F(+)$. 3. From Clue 4: $D(-)$ is Grandmother of $E$, Housewife. (Or $A$ is grandmother). Let's connect: - $F(+)$ [Contractor] $\Longleftrightarrow$ $A(-)$ - Son of $F$ & $A$: $B(+)$ [Doctor], father of $E$. - Spouse of $B$: $D(-)$ [Housewife/Teacher]? - Children of $B$: $C(-)$ [Student] and $E$ [Student] (since $C$ is sister of $E$).
[ F ]+ (Contractor) <=========> ( A )- (Housewife/Teacher)
|
[ B ]+ (Doctor) <=========> ( D )-
|
--------------------
| |
( C )- (Student) [ E ] (Student)
4. Seating Arrangements (Linear & Circular)
4.1 Directional Rules & Conventions
1. Linear Arrangements:
- Facing North:
- Right $\implies$ Towards East (Your Right)
- Left $\implies$ Towards West (Your Left)
- Facing South:
- Right $\implies$ Towards West (Your Left)
- Left $\implies$ Towards East (Your Right)
2. Circular Arrangements:
FACING CENTER FACING OUTSIDE
(Right) (Left)
<--- <---
+----------+ +----------+
| Circle | | Circle |
+----------+ +----------+
---> --->
(Left) (Right)
- Facing Center (Inward):
- Clockwise Turn $\implies$ LEFT
- Counter-Clockwise (Anticlockwise) Turn $\implies$ RIGHT
- Facing Outside (Outward):
- Clockwise Turn $\implies$ RIGHT
- Counter-Clockwise (Anticlockwise) Turn $\implies$ LEFT
4.2 Step-by-Step Solving Protocol
- Count Total Positions: Draw fixed empty slots ($1, 2, 3, \dots, N$).
- Anchor Definite Hints First: Place elements with explicit absolute positions (e.g., "$X$ sits at the extreme left end", "$Y$ sits third to the right of $Z$").
- Use Linked / Connected Clues: Look for elements that connect to already placed anchors.
- Handle Conditional Branches (Case I vs Case II): If a clue offers two possibilities, draw two parallel diagrams and eliminate the invalid one when a contradiction arises.
4.3 Worked Examples
Example 4.1: Circular Arrangement (Facing Center)
Problem: 8 friends — $A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H$ — sit around a circular table facing the center. 1. $A$ sits third to the left of $B$. 2. $H$ sits second to the right of $A$. 3. $F$ sits second to the left of $E$. 4. $E$ is not an immediate neighbor of $B$. 5. $C$ sits third to the right of $D$.
Step-by-Step Solution:
- Anchor $B$ and $A$:
- Place $B$ at bottom position (Pos 6).
- Facing Center $\implies$ Left is Clockwise.
- 3rd to the left of $B$ (Clockwise): Pos $6 \to 5 \to 4 \to 3$. Place $A$ at Pos 3.
(Pos 1)
(Pos 8) (Pos 2)
(Pos 7) (Pos 3: A)
(Pos 6: B) (Pos 4)
(Pos 5)
- Place $H$:
- $H$ is 2nd to right of $A$. Right is Counter-Clockwise.
-
Counter-clockwise from Pos 3: Pos $3 \to 2 \to 1$. Place $H$ at Pos 1.
-
Place $E$ and $F$:
- $E$ is not neighbor of $B$ $\implies E \ne \text{Pos 5}, E \ne \text{Pos 7}$.
- Available slots for $E$: Pos 2, Pos 4, Pos 8.
- $F$ is 2nd to left of $E$ (Clockwise by 2 steps).
- If $E = \text{Pos 4}$, 2 steps clockwise gives Pos 2. Valid! ($F = \text{Pos 2}$).
-
If $E = \text{Pos 2}$, 2 steps clockwise gives Pos 8. Valid!
-
Place $D$ and $C$:
- $C$ is 3rd to right of $D$ (Counter-clockwise by 3 steps).
- Testing combinations yields unique slot assignment:
- Pos 1: $H$
- Pos 2: $F$
- Pos 3: $A$
- Pos 4: $E$
- Pos 5: $C$
- Pos 6: $B$
- Pos 7: $G$
- Pos 8: $D$
5. Direction Sense & Spatial Reasoning
5.1 The 8-Point Cardinal Compass Matrix
NORTH (0° / 360°)
|
NORTH-WEST (315°) | NORTH-EAST (45°)
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
WEST (270°) -------+-----------+------- EAST (90°)
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
SOUTH-WEST (225°) | SOUTH-EAST (135°)
|
SOUTH (180°)
5.2 Angular Movements & Directional Changes
- Clockwise (CW) Turn: Rotates right ($+ \theta$).
- Anticlockwise (ACW) Turn: Rotates left ($- \theta$).
- Net Angle Formula: $$\theta_{\text{net}} = \sum \theta_{\text{CW}} - \sum \theta_{\text{ACW}}$$
- If $\theta_{\text{net}} > 0$: Turn $\theta_{\text{net}}$ degrees Clockwise from initial direction.
- If $\theta_{\text{net}} < 0$: Turn $|\theta_{\text{net}}|$ degrees Anticlockwise from initial direction.
5.3 Shortest Distance Calculation (Pythagoras Theorem)
To compute final direct displacement from initial starting point:
$$d = \sqrt{(\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2}$$
where: - $\Delta x = \text{Net Displacement along East-West axis} = |\sum \text{East} - \sum \text{West}|$ - $\Delta y = \text{Net Displacement along North-South axis} = |\sum \text{North} - \sum \text{South}|$
5.4 Solar Shadow Reference Rules
Shadows are always cast in the direction opposite to the light source:
| Time of Day | Sun Position | Shadow Direction | Person Facing North | Person Facing South |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morning (Sunrise) | East | WEST | Shadow on LEFT | Shadow on RIGHT |
| Evening (Sunset) | WEST | EAST | Shadow on RIGHT | Shadow on LEFT |
| 12:00 Noon | Overhead | No Shadow | N/A | N/A |
5.5 Worked Example: Path & Distance Analysis
Problem: Rohan walks $10\text{ m}$ North from point $P$, turns right and walks $15\text{ m}$. He then turns right again and walks $10\text{ m}$. Finally, he turns left and walks $5\text{ m}$ to reach point $Q$. 1. What is the shortest distance between $P$ and $Q$? 2. In which direction is $Q$ with respect to $P$?
Step-by-Step Solution:
15 m (East)
(North) +------------+
10 m | | 10 m (South)
| |
P + +-------> Q
5 m (East)
- Breakdown Movement Vectors:
- Move 1: $+10\text{ m}$ North
- Move 2: $+15\text{ m}$ East
- Move 3: $-10\text{ m}$ South (Cancels North movement)
-
Move 4: $+5\text{ m}$ East
-
Net Displacement:
- $\Delta y\ (\text{North-South}) = 10\text{ m} - 10\text{ m} = 0\text{ m}$
-
$\Delta x\ (\text{East-West}) = 15\text{ m} + 5\text{ m} = 20\text{ m (East)}$
-
Answers:
- Shortest Distance $d = \sqrt{0^2 + 20^2} = \mathbf{20\text{ m}}$.
- Direction of $Q$ relative to $P$ = EAST.
6. Quick Reference Summary & Formulas
+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Concept | Quick Formula / Rule |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Reverse Alphabet Pos | Reverse Position = 27 - Forward Position |
| Syllogism Income/Exp | A(100-50), E(100-100), I(50-50), O(50-100) |
| Middle Term Syllogism | Middle Term must be 100 in at least one premise |
| Circular Facing In | Clockwise = LEFT, Counter-Clockwise = RIGHT |
| Circular Facing Out | Clockwise = RIGHT, Counter-Clockwise = LEFT |
| Shortest Distance | d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2) |
| Sunrise Shadows | Sun in East --> Shadow falls WEST |
| Sunset Shadows | Sun in West --> Shadow falls EAST |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
7. CoCubes High-Frequency Logical Reasoning Patterns, Speed Shortcuts & Solved PYQs
Source Research: Extracted from PrepInsta, FACE Prep, and IndiaBIX CoCubes Logical Reasoning archives.
Section Overview: 15 Questions in 15 Minutes. Core emphasis on Syllogisms (100-50 Method), Seating Arrangements (Linear & Circular), Coding-Decoding, and Blood Relations.
7.1 High-Frequency Question Patterns & Speed Shortcuts
| Topic Cluster | Pattern Description | CoCubes Speed Shortcut Rule | Target Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syllogisms | 2–3 premises with "All", "Some", "No" statements | 100-50 Income/Expense Rule: If Middle Term is $50/50$, reject conclusions. Expense $\le$ Income. | $< 25 \text{ sec}$ |
| Circular Seating | 6–8 people around a circular table facing center | Facing Center: Clockwise = Left, Counter-Clockwise = Right. Place fixed anchor first. | $< 60 \text{ sec}$ |
| Linear Seating | 5–8 people facing North in a single row | Facing North: Right = East (your right), Left = West (your left). Fill extreme end anchors. | $< 50 \text{ sec}$ |
| Blood Relations | Statement pointing to a photo or family relations | Generation Gap Number ($\Delta G$): Assign $+1$ for parent, $0$ for sibling, $-1$ for child. Match target $\Delta G$. | $< 30 \text{ sec}$ |
| Coding-Decoding | Letter shift or fictitious language ("Chinese coding") | Elimination Method: Match common words across sentences to isolate target codes instantly. | $< 30 \text{ sec}$ |
7.2 Solved CoCubes Syllogism & Seating Arrangement PYQs
PYQ 7.1 (Syllogisms - Universal & Particular Combination)
Problem:
Statements:
1. All books are pens. ($\text{Book}^{100} \text{ -- Pen}^{50}$) $[+]$
2. Some pens are pencils. ($\text{Pen}^{50} \text{ -- Pencil}^{50}$) $[+]$
Conclusions:
I. Some books are pencils.
II. Some pens are books.
Options:
A) Only conclusion I follows
B) Only conclusion II follows
C) Either I or II follows
D) Neither I nor II follows
Step-by-Step Solution & Speed Trick: 1. Test Conclusion I ("Some books are pencils"): - Requires combining Premise 1 & Premise 2. - Middle Term = Pen. Value in Premise 1 = $50$; Value in Premise 2 = $50$. - Middle Term Sum = $50 + 50 = 100$? NO! Middle term condition fails ($50/50$). - Therefore, NO DEFINITE CONCLUSION between Book and Pencil. Conclusion I does NOT follow. 2. Test Conclusion II ("Some pens are books"): - Single premise conversion from Premise 1 ("All $\text{Book}^{100}$ are $\text{Pen}^{50}$"). - Valid conversion of A Type $\to$ I Type ("Some $\text{Pen}^{50}$ are $\text{Book}^{50}$"). - Income/Expense check: Pen Income 50 $\to$ Expense 50; Book Income 100 $\to$ Expense 50 (Valid!). - Conclusion II DEFINITELY FOLLOWS.
Correct Answer: B) Only conclusion II follows
PYQ 7.2 (Syllogisms - Negative Premises & Universal Deduction)
Problem:
Statements:
1. No cat is a dog. ($\text{Cat}^{100} \text{ -- Dog}^{100}$) $[-]$
2. All dogs are elephants. ($\text{Dog}^{100} \text{ -- Elephant}^{50}$) $[+]$
Conclusions:
I. Some elephants are not cats.
II. No cat is an elephant.
Options:
A) Only conclusion I follows
B) Only conclusion II follows
C) Both I and II follow
D) Neither I nor II follows
Step-by-Step Solution & Speed Trick: 1. Analyze Premises: - Premise 1 ($-$), Premise 2 ($+$). Middle Term = Dog ($100$ in Premise 1, $100$ in Premise 2). - Middle Term Condition: $100 + 100 \implies \mathbf{Valid!}$ - Sign of Combination: $(-) + (+) \implies \mathbf{\text{Negative Conclusion } (-)}$. 2. Test Conclusion I ("Some $\text{Elephants}^{50}$ are not $\text{Cats}^{100}$"): - Type O ($-$). Sign matches requirement ($-$). - Income vs Expense: - Elephant: Income $= 50$, Expense $= 50$ (Valid). - Cat: Income $= 100$, Expense $= 100$ (Valid). - Conclusion I DEFINITELY FOLLOWS. 3. Test Conclusion II ("No $\text{Cat}^{100}$ is an $\text{Elephant}^{100}$"): - Type E ($-$). Elephant Expense $= 100$, but Elephant Income $= 50$ in Premise 2. - Expense ($100$) exceeds Income ($50$). INVALID! Conclusion II does NOT follow.
Correct Answer: A) Only conclusion I follows
PYQ 7.3 (Circular Seating Arrangement - 6 Persons Facing Center)
Problem:
6 friends — $A, B, C, D, E, F$ — sit around a circular table facing the center.
1. $A$ sits second to the left of $C$.
2. $B$ sits immediate right of $C$.
3. $D$ sits second to the right of $B$.
4. $E$ sits between $A$ and $D$.
Who sits opposite to $C$?
Options:
A) $D$
B) $E$
C) $F$
D) $A$
Step-by-Step Solution & Diagram: 1. Draw 6 slots ($1$ to $6$ clockwise around circle). Since all face center: Clockwise = Left, Counter-Clockwise = Right. 2. Anchor $C$ at Slot 1: - Second to left of $C$ (2 steps Clockwise) $\implies A$ is at Slot 3. - Immediate right of $C$ (1 step Counter-Clockwise) $\implies B$ is at Slot 6. 3. Place $D$: - Second to right of $B$ (from Slot 6, 2 steps Counter-Clockwise) $\implies D$ is at Slot 4. 4. Place $E$: - $E$ is between $A$ (Slot 3) and $D$ (Slot 4) $\implies E$ is at Slot 3.5? Wait! In 6 slots: Slot 3 is $A$, Slot 4 is $D$. So $E$ sits at Slot 4... let's check slots: - Slot 1: $C$ - Slot 6: $B$ (Immediate right of $C$) - Slot 5: $D$ (Second to right of $B$) - Slot 4: $E$ (Between $A$ at Slot 3 and $D$ at Slot 5) - Slot 2: Remaining person $F$ 5. Opposite Pairs in 6-person circle: - Slot 1 ($C$) is opposite Slot 4 ($E$). - Slot 2 ($F$) is opposite Slot 5 ($D$). - Slot 3 ($A$) is opposite Slot 6 ($B$).
Slot 1: C
/ \
Slot 6: B Slot 2: F
| |
Slot 5: D Slot 3: A
\ /
Slot 4: E
Correct Answer: B) E
PYQ 7.4 (Linear Seating Arrangement - 5 Persons Facing North)
Problem:
5 students — $P, Q, R, S, T$ — sit in a single row facing North.
1. $S$ sits between $T$ and $Q$.
2. $Q$ sits to the immediate left of $R$.
3. $P$ sits at the extreme left end.
Who sits at the extreme right end of the row?
Options:
A) $Q$
B) $R$
C) $S$
D) $T$
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Create 5 slots ($1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ left to right).
2. Clue 3: $P$ sits at extreme left end $\implies \text{Slot 1} = P$.
3. Clue 2: $Q$ is immediate left of $R \implies (Q, R)$ form an adjacent block QR.
4. Clue 1: $S$ is between $T$ and $Q \implies T - S - Q$.
5. Combine blocks: $T - S - Q - R$.
6. Place in remaining Slots 2 to 5:
- Slot 1: $P$
- Slot 2: $T$
- Slot 3: $S$
- Slot 4: $Q$
- Slot 5: $R$
7. Person at extreme right end (Slot 5) = $R$.
Correct Answer: B) R